Walter, 38th &
Chicago Bus Stop, South Minneapolis, MN, by Wing Young Huie 2012
Denotation:
In this photo the first thing that stands out is a young Latino
male sitting at a city bus stop holding a sign that reads “Equality for the
undocumented.” The young man is dressed casually in a hoodie, jeans, and
converse. There is a long string of cars lined up on the side of the street in
the background. A wall and car are directly behind the bench. There is litter
under the bench and in the bushes in the background making the area look
rundown and uncared for. A simple bench and street sign are the only components
of the bus stop in the image.
Connotation:
As you take a deeper look at the image portrayed in this
photo, you can make conclusions about the area in which this was taken. The
litter surrounding the stop and the simplicity of the bench creates the idea
that this bus stop is located in an area of low socioeconomic class where there
is not someone working on the upkeep of the community stop. As you can tell
from the cars lined along the street in the background, this bus stop is
located in a populated urban area of South Minneapolis.
Casual clothing worn by the man at the bus stop indicated
that he is not going to work at a high-paying office job, but rather if he is
heading to work he is most likely a laborer. The sign he hold protests the
inequality of treatment toward undocumented workers signifying that he is
probably the victim of unfair treatment and pay because of his status as an
undocumented citizen. It is also safe to assume that mistreatment of workers is
an issue for many of the people in the community, not just for this man.
Attwood vs. Huie:
In Huie’s image, Walter,
he shows an event of “othering” that happens all the time in our society.
Hatred and anger towards immigrants for
traveling into the US illegally and occupying many labor jobs creates stereotypes
towards all Latino Americans. The language we use towards these individuals
such as “un-American” and “illegal” creates an atmosphere that condones
mistreatment of these individuals in the form of unfair pay and unsafe working
conditions.
The man in this image makes a bold statement addressing
the fact that these individuals are being abused because of their citizenship
status and our society is profiting from it. This situation and image represent
how “othering” allows society to commit immoral acts against “other” people.
In The Handmaid’s
Tale, Attwood also uses language to create “others.” By categorizing each
type of individual into a specific group with a specific name such as, “handmaids,”
“Aunts,” or “Commanders.” It alienates a person from anyone in another group. The
society in THT destroys the concept
of an individual and functions on the idea that everyone is just part of a
whole, the wholes being the groups.
This lack of individualism allows for extreme “othering”
and condones actions such as torture. Aunts often tortured handmaids that misbehaved
and this was okay because the Aunts were superior and the handmaids were “other.”
In both today’s society represented by Huie, and the
society in The Handmaid’s Tale
represented by Attwood, “othering” is an deed that allows immoral actions to
occur. From these two examples it is shown that “othering” is a very negative
thing done within societies. It was also clear from these two sources that
language and stereotypes are a large factor in how “othering” occurs. By trying
to alter the common language used towards groups, we can begin to see
them not as “other” but as fellow human beings.
I really like your interpretation of this photo. I agree with both of your analyses of it. I agree that our society feels a lot of anger and hatred towards immigrants. But are these the only emotions we feel towards them? And how did we develop these emotions if American is "the melting pot" of the world? I also agree with you about our society using language to condone the mistreatment of immigrants. I think our acceptance of slang words is evidence of this. Your last sentence was interesting to me. I don't think that we view the "others" as inhuman. I think we view them as 100% different than us, but I'm not sure we see them as inhuman. Is there evidence to support the claim that we do see them as inhuman? Where?
ReplyDeleteWhat a strong response, Abby. It was well-organized, thorough, and treated both texts equally. I also agree with Annie's comment about your last sentence- 'othering' is often mistaken as creating outcasts or as not accepting those who are different. While it can be something negative, 'othering' can also be postive as we cite (and most often accept) differences.
ReplyDeleteI feel pretty surprised. Now that I think of it, I wonder how I did get negative emotions towards immigrants when America is supposed to be the melting pot. How could we condone the people who represent a part of our identity? I agree "othering" shows that these people are really different from us, but how? Is it just because of their job? ethnic background? language? Culture? I have never really payed attention to how these immigrants are different, they just always seemed to be different, the "other". Truthfully, I know we all at a point were immigrants because not many of us can classify as Native American. How are we then actually different from this "other"?
ReplyDelete